The Hegemonic Mindset

In Western Europe of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the idea of a unified civilization (civilization in the singular), which would embody in itself the destiny of all mankind, was first conceived. This destiny consisted in the overcoming of tradition and traditional values; and thus, it swept away the very foundation of the sacred civilizations that existed in that period. They meant nothing more than backwardness (from the modern West), a set of prejudices and false idols.

Article 76: Subjective vs Objective Value

Wikipedia:
In all its uses, the Tao is considered to have ineffable qualities that prevent it from being defined or expressed in words. It can, however, be known or experienced, and its principles (which can be discerned by observing nature) can be followed or practiced.

Article 74: XIVth BRICS Summit Beijing Declaration

15. We  reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and continue to support World Health Organization (WHO) to play the leading role in the global health governance, while supporting other UN relevant agencies’ activities….

Article 71 New World: A different take on Diversity

Suggestion: Oriental polities now assuming a leading role in this next phase of world development should consider taking their cultural synthesis of Daoist, Confucian and Buddhist mores as a foundation for modern societies to foster experience of sacred reverence for life and Nature

About High Culture – a comment

But facing the multipolarists are the unipolarists. However this is not so much the so-called Outlaw US Empire, a hegemonic nation state based in a geographical location, or a race of ‘Anglo-Saxons,’ as a system, a way of doing things. Some called it technicity, I believe, or more simply a technocracy. Whatever it is called, we may soon all find ourselves digitally bound together in some sort of post nation state One World system, and quite possibly the same people and nations advocating multipolarity will take us down that road too.