Yi: Trump Assassination Attempt 40-4 > 7 < 63

Gua #40 Relief

Another political Yi Reading, this one based on the time and date of an Event, in this case the seeming attempted assassination of Donald J Trump, once a US President and now leading in the polls to be so again in November, despite being under relentless, and largely bogus, legal attack and having been the victim of media and Intelligence service malpractice for almost a decade now. The Yi Reading is fairly straightforward, mainly that the attack failed and Trump will emerge stronger than before with change of management and discipline in the mix, perhaps within his own campaign or perhaps on the national level if he wins.


Yi: Bobby Kennedy Congressional Election Scenario 62-2,5 > 28 <28

Gua Hexagram 62

Another Yi. We have started moving up the hill to new property and will need a while to set in, so still no composing going on apart from regular haiku which have taken to publishing on X. Will compile some of the better ones into a pdf and publish here soon perhaps. But there’s another excuse for all the Yi Readings: the news has been quite dramatic of late, both with domestic US politics and on the geopolitical stage. I suspect things will continue to heat up as summer peaks in Northern nations.

This one is about a post I read on X by a reputable lawyer which states that if Bobby K wins enough States in the electoral college to prevent either Biden or Trump from getting to 270, then the Presidency is decided by votes in the Congress, which has happened in US history before. As far as I know this is an accurate statement. But will it happen? I queried the Yi. Am not sure I got a clear answer, actually, but some of the commentary from the two thousand year old text, especially in the changing lines, was remarkably apropos to the subject matter, so that’s something. There is also clear reference to his having powerful ancestors.

One overall dynamic is the Hexagram #62 Preponderance of the Small juxtaposed both by Nuclear and Derived #28 Preponderance of the Great. One is energy directed inward (two yang lines in the middle) to energy directing outwards (four yang lines in the middle). The first, #62, generally advises that one should avoid trying to fly high and rather stay low (though the changing line about shooting into a cave to get game is provocative in this context of waiting for Congress to elect the President versus winning it by the usual elective process); but #28, unusually both the Nuclear and Derived, is the opposite of #62, from emphasizing smallness to greatness. A powerful time. Big things might happen, but also they could all be too much and the ‘ridgpole’ will collapse. There is a lot going on with these Hexagrams which to my mind means Bobby has a shot, though generally he should keep a low profile during these overheated times.

Of note: #28 was the Past Influence Hexagram of the recent Biden-Trump Cast. The American socio-political dynamic has got to a boiling point, it’s all too much. There is no reasonable middle, rather the excess has to continue to its natural end, which will turn out to be some sort of breakage or collapse. This really has to happen first before any sort of reform or repair can take place. This is what the repetition of #28 in these Casts seemingly indicate.

Here is the Reading:

Yi: Biden post-debate Prognosis 33-1,2 > 1 < 44

Gua Hexagram 33 Retreat

NAME AND STRUCTURE
Dun is to hide, to withdraw, to retreat. Wilhelm translates Dun as Retreat and Blofeld as Yielding, Withdrawal. In this book, the term Retreat is used. The ideograph of Dun consists of two parts. On the left is an ideograph from the remote past. Three curved strokes represent three footprints moving forward. Underneath the three strokes is a tiny ideograph, zhi, meaning “stop.” These two ideographs create a picture of going forward and stopping abruptly. The ideograph on the right is complicated, consisting of three pictures: a little pig, a piece of meat, and a hand. A piece of pork is offered as a sacrifice at a memorial ceremony. The little pig is cut into two portions —shown at the top and the bottom of the ideograph. In the middle, there is a piece of meat at the left and a hand at the right. Taken together, this is a picture of someone performing a sacrificial ceremony during a retreat.
Sequence of the Gua: Things cannot abide long in the same place. Thus, after Long Lasting, withdrawal and retreat follow.
The structure of the gua is Heaven above, Mountain below. The attribute of Heaven is creative power. In this gua it represents a sage who lives in accordance with the will of Heaven. The attribute of Mountain is keeping still. The structure shows that a sage confronts stillness and retreats.
There are four solid lines and two yielding lines in this gua. The two yielding lines stand at the bottom. They are moving forward. This is a situation where inferior persons were multiplying and increasing in power. It is time for the wise to retreat. Retreat is not flight. To flee, to escape danger in any circumstance, is cowardly. But retreating can also be aimed at preserving one’s strength, waiting for the right time for future advance. A wise person uses strength properly.
When the time is not right, retreat. King Wen’s Decision says that for the little it is favorable to be steadfast and upright. The word little denotes inferior people. In the time favoring the inferior, it is better for the wise to retreat, keeping steadfast and upright for future advancement.
This gua, Dun, is one of the twelve tidal gua. It represents the sixth month of the Chinese lunar calendar. [Alfred Huang: The Complete I Ching.]


Attached are two readings, one from a Cast using the 3-coin method (my default) and another using a calculation based on Date and Time. They both come out with a decidedly negative view. In the news since the debate between the two main political leaders in the US the media immediately pounded on Senior Citizen Joe who had a prolonged, 90 minute ‘senior moment’. Personally, I thought both candidates performed poorly on several levels with neither one saying anything truly memorable or insightful, but that’s just me: am not a voting American citizen or resident so don’t have that much skin in the game, although of course what happens in the States still affects the whole world. Whether the media reaction was the result of mysterious coordination – which it certainly appeared to be – or a natural phenomenon, the result of the debate was to instantly place doubt on Joe Biden’s candidacy going forward and this perspective runs through the following two readings.

The one based on date and time is entitled ‘The Trump-Biden Debate’ so theoretically is viewing both protagonists equally. The reading is unusual in that because the Derived Hexagram (after applying the Changing Line #2) is #1 The Creative which has a binary mathematical value of zero, the calculations for the Past and Future Influence at the top and bottom of the display of five hexagrams do not change (because no yin/broken lines which are the ones with values – 1,2,4,8,16,32 from top line to bottom line, from studying which Leibnitz developed binary calculations now used in all computers).

The second Reading is from the coin cast and specifically queries ‘Biden’s Prognosis’ so rightly is focused only on the conflicted incumbent.

So with that as a caveat, both of these Readings take the view that Biden is in deep trouble at the very best, mainly leaving Trump out of the picture. That reflects the effect in the US media. The fact that the Hexagrams lend themselves so easily to this narrative to my mind indicates a certain synchronicity and therefore confidence in the Reading. Time will tell.

In 2020 I did a cast on Trump and received #3 Difficult Beginnings (of something significant) but the changing line indicated that if he lacked support he would only meet with humiliation. That proved surprisingly on the money. To this day a majority of the US population in surveys indicate they believe the election results were dishonest and there is mounting evidence to support that conclusion, though rarely mentioned in mainstream media. If true that the election which he won was taken away from him by the real powers behind the throne in the US Body Politic, then that I Ching prognostication was spot on: he lacked support from the Ruling Class so even though he was voted in by We The People, that was not enough – and he was humiliated in spades, ongoing to this day.

I did another Cast on Trump after his house was raided and they indicted him. This one clearly indicated that it would go to the Highest Court, aka SCOTUS, where it would probably be resolved. Looks like that happened last week too. There is still a chance they can nab him but the simple truth is that they never found any obvious, substantive wrong-doing and most of the cases against him are based on narrative-driven projections, created by his enemies in the Deep State and the Media who serve them, of his being an evil gauche mastermind.

So it looks like SCOTUS has deep-sixed the Deep State – at least for now. In any case, these two Readings are more about Biden since that is the major takeaway from the debate last week: they were neck and neck with Trump pulling away slightly in swing states, but within minutes of the debate ending, suddenly everyone is wondering whether Senior Citizen Joe is up to continuing as the Democrat Party candidate for President; indeed many are even arguing that he should resign the Presidency altogether and let his Vice President assume the position and both of these I Ching Casts indicate this may well be the best course both for him and the nation.

P.S. As per Huang’s commentary above, Biden’s retirement in whatever form might well happen in July, which is the sixth month of the lunar calendar year which began February 10th this year.

Yi: Will Europe’s Malaise be long or short-lived? 34,1 > 32 < 43

Gua #34

34
Da Zhuang • Great Strength

NAME AND STRUCTURE
Da is great. Zhuang means strength. Both Wilhelm and Blofeld translate Da Zhuang as The Power of the Great. This book adopts its literal meaning, Great Strength. The name consists of two ideographs.


The first one, da, looks like a person standing upright with arms and legs wide open. The attribute of greatness was associated with Heaven, Earth, and human beings.
The second ideograph, zhuang, consists of two parts. On the left is an ideograph from antiquity. It looks like a weapon. In ancient times a weapon was made of bamboo or wood. On the right is another ideograph, shi. In ancient times shi was the lowest class of feudal subordinate. Later on, it came to represent an intellectual. At the very beginning, people of robust strength were selected as guards to protect the royalty. They were as stout and strong as the trunks of trees. The ideograph employs a picture of a strong man with arms stretching out like a cross standing on the ground. When these two pictures are put together, zhuang has the meaning of strength. [Huang: Complete I Ching]

Another Yi Geopolitical Reading, this one arising out of a conversation with a family member about how safe they are living near a US Air Base in Germany (!).

Yi: President Xi’s hold on power #44,5 > 50 < 1

Gua 44 Encounter from Below

The ideograph of Gou is simple. It is composed of a woman and a queen. On the left is a buxom maiden. On the right side is the ideograph hou, a queen. Because a queen always follows the king, hou also means behind. The queen is standing upright and bowing. Underneath her bending body is an open mouth, kou, and above the mouth a horizontal stroke indicating the number one. This one person that the queen is encountering is the king. They meet and come together. The queen greets the king with respect and her best wishes.
The structure of the gua is Heaven above, Wind below. The wind blows everywhere under Heaven, encountering every being. It should be an auspicious gua. However, there is only one yielding line beneath five solid lines, symbolizing that the yin element is advancing and approaching the yang elements. When King Wen saw this happening, he heightened his vigilance. He realized that an unworthy person was worming his way into favour at the court. The growing negative influences would displace good people one after another. Darkness and difficulties had been eliminated, but their negative influences had not totally faded. These influences were permeating different areas. One must beware of this tendency and take prompt precautions against possible misfortune. Thus King Wen’s Decision and the Duke of Zhou’s Yao Text are full of warnings. But Confucius’s commentaries still shed light on the positive side. [Alfred Huang: The Complete I-Ching]

This Yi is in response to a Youtube video I listened to about President Xi having problems with a senior PLA military leader, a fellow ‘Princeling’. There are rumours in China that this Princeling has been detained as part of a larger movement within various leadership factions seeking to displace Xi. I do not pretend to have any understanding of Chinese politics but found the title of the video interesting enough to check out. After listening I still have no personal opinion on the matter, but the Yi seems to relate well with the Query along with providing advice for the leader in question. (The Youtube was published three weeks ago so for all I know is already obsolete news!)

Yi: Trump’s prospects after Guilty verdict #63,0

Hexagram 63 Before Completion

Note: this Cast echoes one done about DJT four years ago before the 2020 election whose Derived was #63. The Primary was #3 Difficult Beginnings (of a Great Undertaking) whose changing line warned that without sufficient support he would suffer humiliation. That call was on the money.

This one remains to be seen, of course. To be honest, I find both #63 and #64 hard to read. They are important hexagrams because so clearly structured. #1 and #2 are all Yang or all Yin lines respectively. #11 and #12 are Heaven and Earth (all yang or all yin trigrams). #63 and #64 are alternating yang and yin lines, #63 started with a yang line at the bottom whereas #64 starts with a yin line, each one featuring Fire and Water, the two most basic elements in the eight trigram array representing hot and cold, rising and falling, external and internal, visible and hidden, light and heavy, light and dark. But in their configuration in these two Hexagrams, they alternate one after the other from bottom to top so in many ways are in perfect equilibrium. Which never lasts. And so is never truly achieved. So any fruition is the beginning of something else. And even the tiniest flicker of change means a new configuration is coming into being, or the perfect fruition one maybe was about to achieve is altered ever so slightly. But every so slightly is still completely different because not the same. These two have a sense of a process or dynamic drawing to a close, achieving balance or fruition. Maybe. Or not at all.

Plus in this Cast, there is no changing line to provide hint, guideline or warning. Nada.

The Past Influence #2 and the Heaven, Earth and Man method (personally developed) provides more hints, as explained in the Commentary above.

But with all Trump Casts I get the same feeling: great things are possible but …. there is always a ‘but’.

For the record, am neither supporter nor detractor. That said, I generally support Trump supporters who are mainstream Americans wanting their country to better reflect their idea of what it should be and feel it has been going astray with overly Big Government for far too long and which is increasingly hostile to themselves. They are beginning to feel like unwanted foreigners in their own nation. This isn’t right! For far too long the political leaders on offer from the two main political parties have failed to address their grievances and positive aspirations. I for one hope such grievances can be addressed and such aspirations realized.

Time will tell.

Layers & Levels Punto 6: Terrence Howard’s Multidimensionality

THE CONDITIONS OF ONE

I hope that I have demonstrated how important it is that we fully understand the structure of One and see it in its true light and magnitude. On a grand scale One is the accumulative product of All Things combined, yet it is also the smallest reflection of the Whole.

Albert Einstein called it a “quanta” in 1921, and also referred to it as a “quantum”. We exist in Multi-Dimensional Space/Time where the basic fundamental states of existence and perception are expressed in 3 Dimensions and they are height, width and depth. Yet, we cannot perceive or even begin to measure either of the 3 expressed Dimensions mentioned here without the position from which we observe the intersection of these planes. A position that is in and of itself a separate and distinct Dimensional plane of Space /Time.

Consequently, there are at the very least four necessary Dimensions for anything to exist within the visible Universe. Four equal and opposite pressure conditions compressed within a singularly locked position. Each one of these Dimensions applies a Force upon each other and Space/ Time as Newton expressed so superbly, “Every action has an equal and opposite reaction,” likewise the unseen Matter that occupies Space and Time is being corralled and compressed by these inertial planes pressing upon one another.

Light was the fastest known substance within the visible Universe until Birkeland Currents indicated that information in the electric currents traveled at speeds far superior to light, but light was a good speed to go by. In fact, through light we observe All Things. Therefore, it is only fitting for us to illuminate this subject and the structure of One by its characteristics. Because of the extreme curvature of Space/Time, light waves will ultimately curve back on to its original position finishing a circuit. Light waves fan out in all directions, and when they have expanded as far as the curvature of Space/Time allows and begins to circle back towards its beginning, the collection of those closed circuits forms countless ripples of stacked spheres.

From Terrence Howard’s published manuscript: https://tcotlc.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/OTOET_PREVIEW_062_October_03_2021.pdf From his website at: https://tcotlc.com/ His interview with Joe Rogan is at: https://rumble.com/v4w4xfe-the-joe-rogan-experience.-joe-rogan-experience-terrence-howard.html

I stumbled upon Terrence’s interview with Joe Rogan via a 1-minute clip on X, which just signed up for recently despite misgivings. (Too much stuff from too many angles!) It looks like he is either an undiscovered genius or somewhat, albeit brilliantly so, insane. Not for me to judge; I know little of physics. However, much of what I have heard in the interview thus far (only one out of three hours in) makes a certain amount of sense. More importantly, the quote above from the Chapter in his book entitled “The Conditions of 1” echoes what I published yesterday in Chapter 11 “Kitchen Sink Multidimensionality”. Basically, in order to have dimension of space with height, depth and width you have to have a mind perceiving it. The relevant statement therein is emboldened: Yet, we cannot perceive or even begin to measure either of the 3 expressed Dimensions mentioned here without the position from which we observe the intersection of these planes. A position that is in and of itself a separate and distinct Dimensional plane of Space /Time. So he too describes mind as an additional dimension.

Second, the last paragraph describes the Vortex principle, which is the guiding Logo of this series, also emboldened: Because of the extreme curvature of Space/Time, light waves will ultimately curve back on to its original position finishing a circuit.

Nice when other people align with what you have been coming up with on your own. Of course none of us is really on our own, nor does anyone really come up with anything entirely new. But anyway, yesterday I published Chapter 11 and today here is somebody else maintaining essentially the same thing albeit but from a quite different perspective.

Layers & Levels Punto 5: Third Person Objective View: a Philosophical Devil

Throughout the Series there has been a struggle, a War even, between a powerful Hegemon and a somewhat disorganized, insouciant Resistance. The Hegemon is the Devil lurking in the Dark Forest, his sulphurous waft pervading the entire forest.

And the philosophical Devil, simply put, is the almost universal assumption that modern peoples, East and West, have adopted, most of us unknowingly, unwittingly, that there is a Third Party World out there, an ‘objective reality’ that exists on its own whether or not there are living creatures inhabiting it.

When we look up at the night sky, we can see thousands, possibly millions, of stars, which we have scientifically deduced are inanimate balls of brightly burning gas, with darker, smaller blobs in between made of denser matter that are planets in orbit around their larger stars. There is evidence that the world exists without intelligence, without sentience, without soul, without purpose. At the particulate level we find not stars and planets but a remarkably similar-looking universe, namely no end of billiard-ball like particles orbiting around each other, albeit when we go deeper we find quarks and such that zoom in an out, that split into two, that can disappear and magically reappear in a different place, that have been determined to be ‘potentiae’, in other words something between being and non-being and which moreover behave according to the presence of the observers. Naturally, we do not imagine that stars and planets follow those same rules, but it does give pause to many scientists who have followed the materialist assumption as far as it can go and found that the building blocks of physical matter – of what is real versus what is conceived or imagined – exists in a borderland between existence and non-existence.

So the assumption that only the physical is real and anything else is not real lacks any observable, scientific basis making a self-existing, inanimate basis of a Reality which is, therefore, a non-living matrix. Some even insist that mind is only illusory and similarly inanimate, essentially an hallucination caused by chemical interactions in the physical brain.

This assumption, that there is a ‘third party’ view, a view without a mind or soul, a mechanical basis of all Reality, is the modern age’s Philosophical Devil.

Layers & Levels Chapter 11 Kitchen Sink Multidimensionality

Mind: the Metaphysical Elephant in the Room

eternity
in a moment
this little yellow flower

24.05.19

Maybe this chapter should be a little Punto – just making a quick point and walking away, leaving it hanging like fruit on a tree. Because the idea here is just to point out something extremely simple but potentially very helpful.

One of the sub-themes of this Layers and Levels series involves revealing how many esoteric and/or metaphysical notions happen naturally in our daily experiences. Too often we read about such things and put them on high, conceptual pedestals and in so doing distance ourselves from them, an unfortunate error. Recently, whilst mulling over some of the implications of the multi-layered paradigm being explored, it occurred to me that in some sense the various layers and levels being discussed are dimensions.

There are two main dimensions with which we are supposedly familiar, namely time and space 1 . Time as we perceive it exists simultaneously with space and yet clearly is a different sort of something. Wolfgang Smith in Chapter 10 has posited the aeviternal as a sphere beyond time that coexists with the Intermediate zone that has time but not the space which takes place at the Corporeal Level. In other parlance we could say there is a timeless Absolute level, a time-space bound Relative Level and an Intermediate Level which, similar to Dream, has time but not physical space. I am not necessarily going along with Wolfgang Smith on this, but I do think he makes a valuable contribution by positing these different levels with some beyond time and others bound by time and/or space.

But let me introduce another dimensional level so obvious that both Professor Smith and everyone else has seemingly overlooked.

Ladies and gentlemen, the metaphysical elephant in the room: Mind.

Leaving aside how it might or might not fit into Smith’s cosmology, let us just posit as components of our experienced reality the following triad:

Time Space Mind

In our experience, there is always some sort of time involved, we are aware every day about whether it is morning, afternoon or evening, whether we are children, adults or senior citizens. Similarly with space we are always somewhere and everything we perceive has its own place relative to our own. Moreover our bodies themselves are three-dimensional with weight, height, thickness and various characteristics we explore and exercise continuously via movement, expression, work, living, loving and so forth.

But along with time and space there is also mind without which there is neither any sense of time nor any awareness of being in one place or another, let alone experiencing a body with its various qualities. Furthermore, if we look at our own personal lived experience there is always some quality of knowing or awareness in the mix which is as continuous and fundamental as both time and space. Indeed, if we think it through, this one come before the other two, or put another way: the other two would not exist experientially without it. Furthermore, we cannot directly identify any beginning or end because it is always there, continuously. We can hypothesize that it began at our birth and will end at our death, but both points are experientially unknown to us in the current moment. Though different things continuously appear on the screen of mind the screen itself remains unchanged. In this sense it lacks either shape or location and is, therefore, formless.

So just as the notion of emptiness or formlessness seems like a remote notion which only the very advanced can understand, actually we experience it all the time every day in the way our mind perceives no end of ever-changing, variegated miracles of experience without itself having any definite location or characteristics, without every fundamentally changing. Mind is a living Absolute, a type of aeviternal even.

Just as time and space are dimensions, so also is mind/consciousness/awareness. This also means that just as Mind is a dimension, so also are Chapter Eight’s Speech and Body.

On the one hand, labelling Mind a dimension might be regarded as just semantic jiggery-pokery. But I think it valuable to point out and define as such because it can help us to understand the nature of reality as far more plastic and playful than most modern materialists such as ourselves tend to ascribe to. The objective reality only comprising physical particles is lifeless, inert. Such a view discounts as irrelevant what we witness when simply looking out of our window: the marvellous natural splendour of sky, clouds, trees, birds, flowers and so forth, all of which beautiful qualities clearly resonate in the minds and spirits of all participating. Surely we should embrace such living, breathing, moving and knowing qualities? This knowing of qualitative differences and inherent play is animated in the dimension of mind, of awareness. This is the experiential universe in which we live and which we help engender and shape by our lives and how we live them. It is a play in which we play a part every moment of every day, including when simply washing our dishes in the kitchen sink.

So when we hear about the multidimensional universes proposed by quantum scientists and science fiction writers, isn’t it nice to know that the universe we currently inhabit is indeed multidimensional, moreover with more dimensions than we have generally noticed. Because once Mind is in the mix, we may very well start discovering a few more related dimensions which again we experience every day in our ordinary lives.

Making them possibly not quite so ordinary after all…

1 We call the latter ‘three dimensional’ though practically speaking the first two don’t happen experientially until all three do.

Haiku: Spring 2024

One blog I greatly enjoy reviews traditional seasonal haiku in Japan where the year is divided into 72 5-day periods each with recommended themes or words. This week was singing frogs. Of course being in Mexico my seasons don’t quite align, but I don’t let that stop me. Have been writing haiku and spontaneous verse for over fifty years. Haiku is nice because it is short and the main point is to capture a moment of nowness. Very clean, direct art form. Sometimes I hit the target, sometimes I miss. It is always a good exercise. Enjoy.

Don’t ask me why (because there is no answer) but for some reason the latest is first and the first is last. And so it goes…

traditional haiku
containing Trump
does not contain Trump!
15:12

Mexican heat wave without
flushed fever within …
still I sip my warm green tea

boiling restless nights
desperately spiders bite
urgently mosquitoes whine

all-encompassing Heaven above
all-manifesting multifarious Earth below
this living, breathing wakeful world is Buddha!
24/05/14 15:06

deep summer night
throbbing frog-song
listening pond

midnight frog drone echo
casting the spell of Collective Dream
our minds enfolding three dimensional space

v2:
midnight frog-song
a spell dreaming our
deep pool of collective Mind

frog-song drone
summoning summer pond
of timeless memories

frog song in the dark
casting deep spells
of warm summer silence

before birth
after death
frogs forever singing
2024/05/11 12:32
https://seasonwords.com/2024/05/10/week-19-frogs-start-singing/comment-page-1/#respond

on my white peony in bloom
a white spider with tiny green eyes
looking back at me
2024-05-04 06:43

our final parting
a last frost
burning my bruised heart

last snow:
colourful crocus petals
tenderly push through
2024/04/27 12:29

spring rain in the sky
rainbows in the mind
barbarian bombs falling!
2024/04/19 09:00

soft spring rain
smooth pebbles glistening
making mottled rainbow reflections
2024/04/19 09:05

Japan… Siberia
We white geese know no human borders
We fly naked… and free
2024/04/13 09:30

New family member:
A local bird, discovering the little pool in our sagging drainpipe,
Has taken to bathing in it many times a day!
2024/04/09

Between heaven and hell
this moment and forever
life is falling cherry blossoms!
2024/03/29 08:30

spring heat wave
Impoverished local selling colourful hand-painted kites…
I drove on by, soon sad,
his tribal ancestors reproaching my selfishness in swirling dust clouds
2024/03/29 08: 20

on freshly oiled leather hinges
gnarly barn door swings open wide
veritable vista of lively white butterflies and daisies!
2024/03/22 09:04

my much loved wife
in her spring green dress
singing in the kitchen!
2024/03/02 19:07

concentrated life
budding
in breathless potential
2024/03/02 19:06

Rain melting snow
on its way
to being forgotten
2024/03/02 18:59

beckoning green buds
abandoning the past
quivering
2024/03/02 18:51

Growing old
is natural enlightenment
Just don’t try to define whatever that is!
March 2 2024 09:51

Singing insects
sounding within
helping to weave our budding three dimensional world

What’s that I hear?
The promising patter of
icicle droplets on the steps outside

Feb 19th: https://seasonwords.com/2024/02/16/week-07-fish-rise-from-the-ice/

Layers & Levels Chapter Ten: The Neoplatonic Tripartite Cosmos

I have recently stumbled upon the work of Wolfgang Smith, a distinguished Professor who graduated from Cornell with three degrees at the age of eighteen, about sixty years ago. He has been quietly revolutionizing philosophy, as it appears many have been doing far from mainstream recognition, first by debunking the core tenets of materialism, and then by rediscovering the Platonic view which can be expressed as a dot in the middle of a circle drawn around the periphery and a line connecting that dot in the middle with a similar dot on the circumference. (!)

To draw this image correctly, IMO there should be no dark area outside the circumference, only between it and the centre. I shall try to make one later.

Before reading further, I highly recommend first reading this article, one of several on his site: https://philos-sophia.org/cosmic-measurable-time/ Then, if you like them, his latest and very short book sums up a productive life’s work with great simplicity and depth: ‘Physics, A Science in Quest of an Ontology’ available in hardback, paper and on Kindle.

========================================================================

Now, assuming you have read the article or watched one or more of many interviews with him on Youtube, we can make some remarks about it tying it in with some of the previous Layers and Levels list, first among which, as I mentioned in a recent chapter, can be regarded the Body, Speech and Mind trinity or triad. In the context of this series, it is also the notion of Mandala which literally means something like a zone or sphere with a centre and fringe and something in between – again a unitary triad in principle. There are your three levels, though one can subdivide or interpenetrate ad infinitum. The father’s mandala inside the marriage mandala operating clumsily one morning in the kitchen mandala having slept in the bedroom mandala within the nearby village mandala where last night there was a bad fire sending the mother to the hospital mandala in the larger town mandala in the national mandala; all such mandalas being distinguishable but also inter-related, inter-penetrating.

We will be re-examining the Mandala notion many times in upcoming chapters. For now let us take a look at Smith’s cosmology, another triad.

He labels the central spot the ‘aeviternal’ which is outside time; he labels the periphery ‘the corporeal world’ which exists within our experienced spatial-temporal dimensions; and the zone in between the two he labels ‘the intermediate’ ‘bounded by’ time but not space. So the aeviternal center is beyond time; the intermediate is bounded by time but not space; and the corporeal world at the circumference is bounded within both time and space.

This all involves what he terms ‘vertical causation’ which acts, from outside time and space, upon the corporeal world in space and time, outside the chain of what he calls ‘horizontal causes’ which in Buddhist terms is known as the karmic law of cause and effect.

The key point here is that physicalists, such as most materialist scientists for example, keep looking for ‘theory of everything’ to be found on the material, causative plane but they will never be able to do so.

And indeed this is for an extremely simple, drop dead obvious reason which physicalists have been training themselves for centuries now to be unable to see, namely the wholistic nature of phenomena. By wholistic I mean that an apple is an identifiable whole. As opposed to a brick, or a door, or a tree, or a house. None of these things exist as such on the physical level. A car comprises many different metal and plastic parts, bit by bit, piece by piece, but there is no actual ‘car’ there as such which can be identified using only physical criteria. No, there is a mind observing the car and can see it as such, just as it can instantly identify, pick up and bite into any apple. This ability to recognize the wholeness of the apple is a type of deus ex machina, the connection between the aeviternal and the corporeal, so basic it gets overlooked.

Then I stumbled on another Western philosopher, John Vervaeke who has formulated what he calls ‘neoplatonic zen’: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lbk3lA6zCic . This is a long talk; there are shorter ones available. From the introduction:

as Thomas Plant in his book the LostWay to the Good argues: ‘neoplatonism was the philosophical version of the Silk Road that bound the East and the West together giving them a shared lingua franca, lingua philosophia, by which they could deeply enter into transformative dialogue and intercultural exchange with each other.’

The lecture is entitled: ‘Levels of Intelligibility, Levels of Self’. So he is all over the ‘Layers and Levels’ notion. He explains how Plotinus argues that both reality and the self comprise various ontological levels, so that examining the one involves examining the other. There is no fundamental split between self and other, between subjective and objective. In this sense, the platonic philosophical view is fundamentally spiritual, though of course not necessarily bound to any particular religious doctrine.

I don’t want to say much more in this chapter. Those interested can watch and enjoy the lectures. But I do want to give a hint at where we might be headed. I say ‘might’ because I don’t have a clearly formulated plan. The contemplative approach from the Buddhist tradition generally involves uncovering the truth, aka ‘dharma’, found within one’s own experience. My teacher sometimes referred to this as ‘kitchen sink reality’. Any ontological levels that exist in philosophically explicated ‘reality’, to be valid, must be observable in our own nature and experience. What this means is that high-falutin’ concepts, or rather basic concepts that sound other-worldly or remote to our ear, to our minds, are in fact simple and continuously manifest in ordinary life.

As simple, for example, as our ability to perceive an apple as an apple. Right there we have multiple layers and levels happening: there is the bare physical level of the object on the wooden table; there is us observing it, in a corporeal, living, breathing form with eyes, lungs, beating heart; there are the particular qualities of the apple, colour, aroma, shape, density, position relative to other phenomena; not to mention how it feels and tastes when bitten into by a mouth with teeth and tongue. The level at which the apple is seen as an apple by ourselves is quite different from the level at which the apple rests on the table as such. The level at which it is tasted is entirely different as well. These levels, ordinary and commonplace as they are, can also be described as ‘ontological dimensions’. Sight dimension. Taste dimension. Time dimension – how long it sits there, and then gradually decomposes, our ongoing breathing and heartbeat as we observe or bite into. Space dimension – relation to other objects around, how it sits there. Emotional dimension – what apples mean to the observer, how its qualities resonate. All these layers and levels are simultaneously ongoing.

Although almost childishly obvious, such ontological layering gets generally overlooked. Indeed, the modern materialist approach tends to oversimplify and then negate too many of these experiential aspects such that when societies are organized around such excessive cancelling, the result is something far from from ideal, indeed not truly human somehow.

In any case, this Chapter provides two examples of contemporary Western philosophers who are bridging a multi-century divide between ancient and modern mentalities. We can see similar work happening in the geopolitical spheres which will no doubt be touched upon later. Indeed, we may well be at the end of the ‘introducing lists’ stage and soon will go into applying some of them to various different scenarios.

[Autobiographical Note: we are in the final stages of building a house, meaning that the bathroom and kitchen fixtures are going in, plus basic kitchen cabinetry, final plumbing, heating systems and so on, all of which require more hands-on oversight than usual. In about a month we hope to be moving into this new home and once settled in I intend to spend the next year steadily working through this series until it finds its natural completion. Until that move and settling-in unfolds, however, I shall probably only offer occasional pieces like this. Once am set up with a new desk, chair and home all around, including banana, macadamia nut, lemon and orange trees, along with delightful accompanying birdsong, production rate will pick up!!]

Layers & Levels Chapter Eight: Body Speech and Mind

We are getting to the end of the initial series of Lists which describe reality from non-materialist points of view, mainly but not only from the Buddhist tradition. This list has only three components and is really less a list as a very basic description of experiential reality. Indeed, perhaps this is the only one I should have offered from the get-go.

Simply put, in life – aka ‘experience’ – there are always three basic layers or levels namely: Body, Speech and Mind.

Body:

We all know what that is. Our physical body which has an inside and an outside. We feel the inside and can perceive our own and others bodies outside. It is that which is physical, dense, solid, particular, existing in a particular place though it is always moving around; it sees, hears, smells, tastes and touches. In short, it has a particular form beyond which is outside, and therefore not, the body.

Mind:

Mind is that which thinks, feels, perceives and processes; more fundamentally mind is that which is aware, awake, conscious. Mind dreams, imagines, analyzes, responds. If the body’s eyes perceive objects in space it is the mind which sees and evaluates them. Mind is that which perceives meaning and via which is channelled intention.

Speech:

This one is less obvious, perhaps, but is simply an interface between Body and Mind. If you go for a walk in the woods, for example, there is no end of speech principle at play: birds singing, squirrels chattering, insects buzzing, monkeys or dogs howling, with occasional louder moos or roars from larger animals. Leaves quiver, reflecting light into variegations of colour, light and dark or release raindrops in a pleasing patter onto the carpet of leaves below which crunch and rustle as we pass. All forms communicate certain qualities to each other in the sensory realm we share. Plants, though having a different sensory makeup, are highly attuned and responsive to what goes on around them – far more than ourselves in many ways. But lacking eyes they do not ‘see’ visual forms as we do though clearly they are aware of other forms around them and adapt or respond to them. All forms and shapes with their colours, textures, odours and movements are in a constant state of transmitting and receiving with all around them.

From a deliberately flowery text I wrote years ago to help work through chronic Lyme Disease :

Sacred Being, the Basis

All beings in this alive and awake self-dreaming universe present aspects of:

Body – some sort of shape or form manifest in location and terrain;

Mind – some sort of consciousness, awareness or intention;

Speech – some sort of communicative expression of meaningful information singing a

Living symphony of ever forming and reforming clouds and waves of Primordial Intelligence

A marvellous holographic self-mothering Song making itself up as it goes along

Saturated in interconnected living presence pervading all and everything,

Manifesting no end of self-organizing life forms, living creatures imagined into sentient being

With all their coemergent elemental and inanimate phenomena

Comprising luminous intelligence inseparably part of the universal background field

Containing, including and pervading all and everything, micro and macro.

Flowers in their flowering communicate the lovely enlightened language of Flowering Being

With manifold qualities of form, texture, colour, temperature, scent, beauty, sensitivity.

As with flowers so with all, from microscopic universes to macrocosmic spiralling galaxies

Multifarious microbes permeating soil and all life forms, primordially awake plants, majestic

Trees, incredible insects, fabulous fishes, beautiful birds, marvellous animals

Minerals, metals, crystals, silver, gold, jewels

Rainbows, sky, stars, ocean, wind, clouds, rain, sunlight, moonlight, thunder, lightning,

Mountains, valleys, jungles, deserts, farms, steppes, rural, urban, stormy, placid

Earth, water, fire, air, red, green, blue, yellow, purple, indigo;

Visibles, touchables, smellables, tastables, audibles, edibles,

Perfumes, spices, herbs, meats, fats, oils, vegetables, fruits, sweets, sours, fermented,

Wools, cottons, furs, silks, costumes, uniforms, males, females, dressed, naked,

All such forms together weaving karmic spells of interdependent being,

Living languages of meaningful qualities – which some call ‘gods’ –

Continuously broadcast and received throughout this dreamlike experiential continuum

All basically empty, basically luminous, basically workable, basically good.


The money quote there in terms of Speech principle is: living languages of meaningful qualities.

As with all such formulations, it is good to sit with them for a while and notice them over time in everyday experience. Body and Mind are fairly straightforward. On a literal and human level, Speech is speaking: with Body and Mind we communicate with each other using both voice-box, tongue and also various facial and other gestures. At some point we evolved initial scratches and scribbles in the dirt into sophisticated mathematical and vernacular languages. But also Speech has to do with the communicative nature of qualities, including how inanimate things like furniture and paintings express their nature to us by communicating something stylistically, atmospherically. Not to mention a lady’s hair, makeup, lipstick, nail polish, dress and smile – all are clear and present, not to mention delightful, examples of the speech principle.

In this sense, all qualities are Speech Realm phenomena. In a way, we can say that everything is talking in one way or another. This is a very deep, all pervasive aspect of living beings and the space, or realm, they inhabit, just as much as space is filled with no end of forms (body) and the ability to navigate in a world filled with such forms (mind).

That said, as with most of these lists, one shouldn’t be too rigid with the categories. Just as there a human beings with jealous god tendencies battling with each other in the canyons of Wall Street, so also there are highly communicative speech realm bodies like a peacock’s tail, or mind and presence rich uber-solid physical manifestations, like a motionless Zen rock garden. In short, all experience blends all three aspects so there is no such thing as only Body or only Mind, however there are these three core different aspects of experience which are both interesting and valuable to contemplate.

Further, the Speech notion highlights several key differences between this and more common materialist formulations describing so-called ‘reality’, including such notions as human beings being evolved apes and such. The Science philosopher and mathematician John Lennox is, along with Iain McGilchrist, one of the leading Western voices exposing the materialist outlook as a) widespread, b) fallacious and c) harmful. Here are some short quotes from Lennox lifted from a video entitled “John Lennox: The Question of Science and God, Part One”:

Information is not reducible to physics or chemistry (physical matter, particles or Body) which means that materialism is false as philosophy…

therefore purely materialistic science is not going to encompass a huge area of reality… making science not the only way to truth..

[indeed] making science the only avenue to truth is very dangerous and logically absurd’.

One ‘area of reality’ the materialist worldview does not see is the Speech realm. Although it may not be structured into words and possess grammatical rules, who can deny that a flower in bloom is expressing no end of qualities to others in the same realm, aka mandala, and in so doing helping to define the nature of that mandala? Similarly, the shape of each and every leaf on each and every tree communicates qualities. In this regard, we could go so far as to say that ALL physical form is designed in such a way as to communicate qualities about itself to the mind level in its realm – indeed it is the mind level that creates any awareness of ‘realminess’.

We can say that all form exists within a field of consciousness-awareness which perceives such forms as qualities expressing the various properties and intentions of the forms in question, such qualities being a type of meaningful language read by mind. So all the time we find ourselves in a realm manifesting forms (body), qualities (speech) and meaningful presence (mind).

So the next time you look at a flower, observe a bee or bird, watch a dog or a human amble across the street, or participate in a conversation among friends at the dinner table, you might want to pick up on the many simultaneous body, speech and mind aspects at play. This won’t trigger a life-changing experience, but it might help you notice what has been right in front of you your entire life in a different, and hopefully interesting, way. It’s a non-materialist way of appreciating the experiential universe we collectively create and share.

Postscript:

I had to write out several versions of this Chapter because too much kept crowding in. This is because, as mentioned at the top, perhaps this ‘list’ is the only one I needed to present. What has become clear is that many future chapters in this Series will be going over different layers and levels of the already presented material essentially drilling further down or using them in various contexts, albeit probably the one most often referenced will be Body Speech and Mind.

For example, one traditional example chucked from this chapter is The Three Bodies of Buddha, usually presented in arcane, impenetrable language. A second aspect is The Three Lords of Materialism’, a fascinating though an entirely different take. Later I will present some critiques of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution wherein one of the most substantive objections is how DNA, which of course Darwin lacked the means to observe and which we now know determines cellular development and function, is a form of code, which is language requiring some sort of mind whose intention and sense of purpose, or meaning, develops such a language which in turn determines cellular form and function making all three levels of Body, Speech and Mind clearly in play no matter how distasteful or ‘unscientific’ materialists may find this simple fact. Darwin’s bottom-up random-genesis theory, which bases all on physical matter, simply doesn’t explain how such language (speech) can have been developed to direct (mind) cellular development, let alone how they integrate and indeed create entire organisms. In any case, the discussion will naturally involve consideration of all three body-speech-mind aspects of living organisms, not exclusively emphasizing only the physical. Indeed, most modern scientists, not familiar with these simple non-materialist ways of viewing this our experiential continuum, lack the vocabulary to easily distinguish these various aspects and rather feel compelled to fit things into a uni-dimensional ‘theory of everything’ instead of accepting that reality comprises various (ever-changing) layers and levels, which of course is the principal thrust of this series.

Finally, here is the rock garden picture again. Hopefully you can easily pick up on various Body, Speech and Mind aspects therein – not to mention various layers and levels…

Layers & Levels Introduction Part Three

The purpose of presenting this series of lists is to provide terms of reference for future discussion and analysis. They have also been offering a slightly progressive journey of sorts in that our initial materialist assumptions, shared by nearly all modern people these days, posit an objective reality out there making all subjective, mind-experienced phenomena somehow less than real even though they comprise the vast majority of both individual and collective human experience. The first list was a quasi objective one, namely the Five Skandhas, starting with form and ending with individuated stream of consciousness, aka ‘me’; we then went through the five Chinese elemental phases, the six realms from Hindu-Buddhist cosmology and finally the five tantric Buddha families. The Five Skandhas are a quasi objectivist 1 list whereas the Five Buddha Families are anything but.

However, I don’t want to entangle the Reader in too many philosophical or analytical weeds by delving deeply (even assuming I were able) into all the many differences and similarities of objective and subjective views of reality; rather have been trying to point out that one major problem with over-reliance on the reductionist materialist, or objectivist, world view is that it blocks out too many vital, not to mention enjoyable, elements in human experience, discounting them as irrelevant and thus banishing them from public discourse and overall culture, a very real, and increasingly world wide, problem. This is not to deny that many of the insights derived from the objectivist point of view are valuable, however they go too far when they insist that only their view works for everything and unfortunately too many of us have consented to such cultural and perceptual parameters being set, to the detriment of all.

This beef animates this entire Layers & Levels presentation which is framed with the intention of demonstrating how so-called ‘reality’ is not only objective and therefore not uni-dimensional, flat, uniform, unchanging, always ‘there’, solid, physical-only and so on. Reality is more like a dream world conjured by a combination of one overall Being or Consciousness field within which unlimited particular living points of view including yourself, myself, the birds, the bees, the flowers and the trees and so on ad infinitum, each of whose perceptions constitute a unique dimension of ‘reality’, something I like to call our ‘Experiential Continuum’.

Within this multi-dimensional context it is possible to develop terms of reference based on observable experience, even if such observation principally comprises direct subjective experience. For example, whether we can prove it or not, when we look up we all see sky; and that sky provides multi-faceted emotional, psychological, physical, cultural and civilizational contexts to our lives. In other words, it is not only hydrogen, carbon dioxide, oxygen and dust particles as measured by scientists. What scientists can tell us about the physical properties of the sky is interesting, even helpful, but it is not the whole story.

In any case, from more non-materialist approaches have developed, especially in Asia, many ways of observing, categorizing and also developing personal, intellectual and spiritual understanding, even mastery, with countless volumes written and schools or disciplines founded dedicated to furthering such knowledge and praxis. What makes this different from the modernist mindset is, again, that they are not based on objectivist assumptions. So in this Series, now that a few examples of non-objectivist ways of viewing reality have been introduced, we can hopefully begin to examine things through the different lens they offer, one which although at first may feel unfamiliar, is in fact much more familiar than the constrained, unnatural straightjacket imposed by the materialist views which of late have come to dominate so much of our modern world.

1: any of various theories asserting the validity of objective phenomena over subjective experience (merriam-webster online)

Layers & Levels Chapter Seven: The Five Buddha Families

We looked at the five elemental phases via a yin-yang formulation, now we shall look at them from the point of view of Buddhist Tantra. Tantra means thread or continuity, the idea being that one thread can go through several layers of fabric, or turn back on itself when being woven. Continuity in that the seeming gap between the wisdom of a fully realized Buddha and the ignorance of an ordinary sentient being mired in emotion-laden samsara is actually non-existent, much as the top and bottom sides of the same hand are mutually co-existent. In the jargon: wisdom and confusion co-emerge, or are ‘not-two’.

So these Five Buddha Families are not materialist descriptions of objective reality rather non-materialist ways of contemplating the inseparability of wisdom and confusion in the five main styles of approach which ultimately are based on the same underlying dynamics as the Five Skandhas.

First, why five? Well, in the case of directions, it is most natural to divide them into four main directions with an additional zone, or dynamic, in the centre. Second, the older texts posit three main drives 1 which later contributors expanded into five to better fit other models like the Skandhas. But we shan’t worry about such arcana; let’s just dive into the Five Buddha Families by describing each one, hopefully during which process the reader will start to pick up on the whole thing.2

Buddha Family:

Buddha means wakefulness or also the space which accommodates all experience. The colour is white, because it includes all others and is somewhat not a colour at all. It is spacious, like an abandoned campsite, or looking across a desert, or endless plains. If a tree, it is probably without leaves in winter. It is decidedly neutral, open, uncurious, bland, flat, featureless, accommodating, unopinionated, simple. A quality of nothing happening and nothing needing to happen. Not restless. When ignorant, it is a bit like animals, somewhat dull and accepting whatever is presented. It can be stubborn too, refusing to allow in new input or different modalities, preferring the familiar; could also be overly attached to basic routines or habits even if they are a little too limited or ignorant. Also Head. Five Skandhas: the fifth, consciousness in which the other four are experienced all together as one. Sense: Hearing.

Vajra Family:

Vajra is an indestructible material, ‘meteoric iron’. Fresh blue, but also white, like bright snow. Precision. Detail. Focus. Clarity. Also Heart. Vajra picks up on the details of form and shape. A leafless tree in winter framed by bright blue sky, or the particularities of white daisies in a green background. It also cuts, like a blade, separating one thing from another and so has a sense of intellect, concept, definition. Neurotic vajra can be angry, even cruel, poking someone in the heart as it were, or the desire for precision turning into obsessive perfectionism or inability to connect on a heart level. Element is Water. Skandha of Form. Sense: Sight.

Ratna Family:

Ratna means jewel, so it connotes richness. The colour is golden yellow. Texture, smell, presence, radiance, manifestation and spreading. Variegation, splotches, moss growing on rocks, profusion of flowers, colours, patterns, complexity. A beautiful woman wearing makeup, with lipstick, earrings, necklaces, rings, bangles, fancy clothing which moves lusciously in swirling curves. A sweet voice, a mothering presence, food on the table, probably a little too much of it, wine, cheese, fruits, abundance. When neurotic it gets overly greedy, sticky, prideful, bloated, with a mind or dwelling filled with collected junk. Element is Earth. Skandha of Feeling (the second). Sense: Smell.

Padma Family:

Padma is a lotus flower, denoting beauty along with a level of radiance that pulls you in. The colour is red. So whereas Ratna’s radiance is that of presence, or glowing, Padma’s radiance is that of a large city with all its lights on at night, glowing in the dark, or in the day displaying its tall, elegant buildings proudly, beckoning to all to come in and display themselves, to spend their money, to break their hearts. Paris is the quintessential Padma city, whereas Florence, no less elegant, is far more Ratna. When neurotic is over-emphasizes passion, sexual or otherwise, seduction, fantasy, grandeur, self-importance. Element is Fire. Skandha is Recognition/Discrimination which has to do with getting into the subtle differences between the forms and textured patterning in Vajra and Ratna, along with the atmospheric context provided by Buddha. Sense: Taste.

Karma Family:

Karma means action, or happening. So the law of Karma is the law of how things happen. The element is all-pervasive Wind which blows everywhere in all directions. Wind can be gentle or destructive, a soft touch or a powerful – though invisible – force. The colour is green symbolizing the profusion of the plant kingdom, of Life in all its endless forms. Karma can be generative or destructive. There are five karmas associated with all five families: Buddha is spaciousness; Vajra is pacifying; Ratna is enriching; Padma is Magnetizing; Karma is Destroying. But it could also be building, getting things done, overcoming obstacles, successfully winning a battle, planning and executing. If Vajra is the outline of a finely honed spear, Karma is the act of plunging it into the enemy. When neurotic it becomes frantic, misdirected, dictatorial, over-controlling, results-obsessed, restless. When sane it is extremely efficient and effective, thorough, complete, masterful. Sense: Touch.

In terms of directions: Vajra is East, Ratna is South, Padma is West, Karma is North, Buddha is Centre. They have been described, not unlike the Skandhas, as somewhat sequential but this is mainly to help describe their comparative differences. In life they are all happening at once all the time. Some people are predominantly one family more than another, but all of us have all five. All material objects and all experiential non-material phenomena have all five just as all living creatures have all five skandhas. Some say that plants don’t have the fifth skandha and possibly not the fourth; there is something to that. But some plant medicine people say that plants dwell in a conscousness state similar to our deep, dreamless sleep which partly explains why in cultures where they are used as sacred medicine they enter peoples’ dreams and give them messages or resolve long-standing health or psychological issues. In any case, plants for sure manifest the five families.

Now: one could no doubt invent five more families putting them in between the current ones, (four main directions, four intermediates, one in the center, and one for the fringe). But then the differences start to become too subtle so each one becomes less distinct. These are both a form of noetic science, a way to highlight certain aspects of experience, and fictive, in that they are a made-up layer of categorization without any material substance. True, but who cannot appreciate the difference between these five core thrusts, styles, insights, ways of being?

Each Family could be described in long chapters, even books, so the above description is about as minimalist as it gets. But if you get a good sense of them, it can be a lot of fun to watch them in action, see their qualities in phenomena.

They are part of the contemplative tradition’s perspective derived from combining a non-materialist view of reality with years of direct, contemplative discipline, which in the Buddhist tradition mainly involves sitting around doing nothing other than to simply witness what is already there without trying to exploit, manipulate or ignore (aggression, passion or ignorance, i.e. Vajra, Padma or Buddha). Like the Six Realms, they provide a different perspective with which to observe and experience phenomena and the life journey. As such, they are part of our non-materialist world view, the sort of thing which reductionist materialism has insisted is of no interest because not ‘real’.

Maybe so. But then Science cannot appreciate the beauty of a flower in bloom, let alone the loveliness of a woman, so clearly there are some areas where Science cannot tread but where non-materialist philosophy and spiritual formulations are at home. What we see with this Five Family model is the merging of physical and mental qualities, for of course the perception of the qualities of the physical is an experiential process, so in the non-material realm qualia (qualities) are the quanta being evaluated.

Indeed, we could go so far as to say that the qualities perceived in any given person, place, thing or subjective experience, are truly what matter, even though such qualities themselves per se are formless, insubstantial aspects we experience when encountering any solid-seeming phenomenon and with these Five Families we also start to merge qualities of objects and phenomenon with emotional and psychological styles, tendencies and manifestation. The whole world becomes like a living, breathing, dynamic Shakespeare production.

Which of course is what it is!

Note: the picture at the top links to an article in a popular American Buddhist magazine so you can get another take. The author is an old friend…

1 Buddha, Vajra and Padma = Ignorance, Aggression & Passion, the latter evolving from the former which includes all. These are the three basic approaches of individuated experience, aka ‘ego’.

2 For an excellent description I highly recommend the book entitled Spectrum of Ecstasy, written by Ngakpa Chögyam, a Welshman early on recognized as an incarnate lama.

Layers & Levels Punto 4 Metacrisis

A call to rediscovering Humanity from Ian McGilchrist, the Sage of the Isle of Skye

Summer sunlight on the green meadows, crofters cottages and rocky mountains of the Trotternish Peninsula, Isle of Skye, Scotland.

This little point (Punto) is simply a shout-out to listen to this condensed, one-hour lecture by Iain McGilchrist entitled ‘A Revolution in Thought’ addressing what some are now calling ‘the metacrisis’, a nice way of saying that everything in the whole world is going to hell in a hand basket on all fronts all at once (!).

For reasons which Iain well describes, we have devalued Goodness, Beauty and Truth, appreciation and experience of which can be called ‘the sacred’, and instead dedicated ourselves to a limited, literal, left brain dominated approach which prides itself on reducing the complex terrain that is ‘reality’ into a clear, compact map and then goes on to believe that the map is real and what it is mapping, the actual terrain, is largely fictive. This is why, for example, most modern scientists pedantically insist that subjective phenomena such as thoughts, feelings, insights, emotional connections, vows, honour, service, loyalty, dedication, sacrifice, the sacred and so much more, not to mention a sense of humour, are all non-existent irrelevancies because they are not ‘actually real’ or ‘really there’ because only the physical is real. Etc.

‘Nuff said. This lecture is well worth listening to because he boils down decades of philosophical and medical research published in two books almost three thousand pages in length into a well-honed one hour presentation.

And if you enjoy the erudite banter of Oxford Don types (Iain used to teach literature at Oxford before going into clinical neurology to better understand human nature), this dialogue between himself and Rupert Sheldrake (a Cambridge PhD) entitled ‘Intersection of Consciousness and Matter’, is also well worth a listen.